DaveK wrote:
Among the many things that get discovered in this maze of APRS is that success depends on a lot of black magic. The short answer to your question is that in the greater LA area you can probably get away with less than wide2-2. If you are communicating over longer distances, wide2-2 will help.
For you, communicating with Hector, Frank or myself, wide2-2 might be more than is necessary. Getting to Ollie in San Diego, wide2-2 would be indicated. So much depends on the digipeaters that serve both stations, the terrain that separates you, how busy the system is, the black magic in place at the time of transmission....................... Get that rig up and running and lets sort you out.
I guess my point is that WideN-n should be used for local operation or to get to an Igate or when a path is unknown. Communications over any distance would not use the WideN-n paradigm at all (except Wide1-1 which is just a RELAY). You would specify the major digipeaters manually. Here is a post from Ollie:
OLLIE wrote:
One other question. When Dave and I were within say 50 miles of one another I was able to see him on my GPS and send him messages. Outside of that we couldn't do anything. At least I couldn't anyway. I believe he got my messages and could see me but I din't get his messages nor could I see him. Maybe my path is wrong???? Let me run something by you and see if my understanding is correct... If using the example in the image below if I were to input a path of "Wide2-2, K6NEX-1, K6NEX-5" that would plot my signal path to the LA area from San Diego providing those K6NEX-? stations were relay staions????
In this example he used a series of K6NEX-* digipeaters to reach LA. I am not sure the Wide2-2 was necessary, a Wide1-1 may have been better. So his path may be something like "Wide1-1, K6NEX-1, K6NEX-5"
Relevant info from the original post:
OLLIE wrote:Because all APRS digipeaters use the same generic call signs, the re-transmission process can happen in several geographic directions simultaneously if several more digipeaters are within range of the one transmitting. A widening circle of digipeats involving more and more digis on each hop will spread outward from the user in all directions. This phenomenon, known as UI flooding, is sharply different from the directed linear sequence of digis, each identified by a unique call sign, used in traditional connected packet.
If you know them, you CAN use explicit call signs in APRS paths instead of the generic WIDE. This is one approach to reducing unnecessary retransmissions, especially in your home territory where you likely will know the actual call signs of local digis.
This is the way I understand it, please correct me if I am missing something.