Please check me in KM6OJB
Thanks
Joe
OAUSA Net - December 15, 2022 - Christmas gifts for the outdoor enthusiasts
Re: OAUSA Net - December 15, 2022 - Christmas gifts for the outdoor enthusiasts
KK6CTT for the online check-in for the 12/15/22 net please.
Cast Iron Ware:
It is always nice to get extra tourniquets or Israeli bandages:
CA APPEALS COURT DENIES STAY OF INJUNCTION IN GUN PRIVACY CASE
BELLEVUE, WA — A California appeals court panel has unanimously denied a request from state Attorney General Rob Bonta for an immediate stay of an injunction in a case brought by the Second Amendment Foundation in a challenge of the state law allowing the state Department of Justice to share personal information about firearms owners with private researchers.
Bonta claimed the law, AB 173, “does not create a serious invasion of privacy.” The trial court disagreed, granting a preliminary injunction to the plaintiffs, thus placing a hold on enforcement of the information sharing law. The case is known as Barba, et.al. v. Bonta.
SAF is joined in the lawsuit by the Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, San Diego County Gun Owners PAC, Orange County Gun Owners PAC, Inland Empire Gun Owners PAC and a private citizen, Ashleymarie Barba. They are represented by attorneys Bradley A. Benbrook and Stephen M. Duvernay with the Benbrook Law Group, PC in Sacramento.
“We’re delighted the appeals court panel unanimously rejected Bonta’s effort to set aside the preliminary injunction because the privacy of California gun owners is important, even if he thinks otherwise,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “Bonta is determined to supply gun owner information to biased researchers who, we believe, will use it to promote additional restrictions on their Second Amendment-protected rights.”
Gottlieb dismissed arguments by Bonta that the researchers take steps to protect identifying information about gun owners.
“That’s not the point,” Gottlieb said. “The point of our challenge is that this information is being shared at all, especially with non-government entities. This isn’t just about Second Amendment rights. California’s law clearly threatens the privacy rights of gun owners.”
The lawsuit was filed because of a change in the California Penal Code that required the state DOJ to share private information on millions of gun owners in the state, with the California Firearm Violence Research Center and others
SAF ATTORNEYS RESPOND TO BONTA, NEWSOM BRIEFS IN CAL. FEE SHIFTING CASE
BELEVUE, WA – Attorneys representing the Second Amendment Foundation and its partners in a challenge of California’s fee-shifting law have filed a consolidated response to court briefs filed by Attorney General Rob Bonta and Gov. Gavin Newsom.
California’s new law includes a one-way fee-shifting penalty to discourage lawsuits against restrictive gun laws, creating a chilling effect on the ability to challenge unconstitutional laws that restrict individual rights and freedoms.
This is the case in which Newsom has intervened with his own attorneys because Bonta recently stepped away from defending the California statute because it is based on a Texas law, known as S.B. 8, which Bonta has already asserted is unconstitutional. The Texas statute deals with abortion. Newsom and state lawmakers created Section 1021.11 in the California statute and admit it was in retaliation against the Texas law.
As noted in the brief, “By intervening here, the Governor has thus offered further proof that Section 1021.11 is an act of political retribution that he intends to follow through on, at the expense of California citizens’ fundamental rights, if S.B. 8 is upheld. Meanwhile, he has failed to offer any colorable argument that Section 1021.11 is constitutional. It is not. The Court should declare Section 1021.11 unconstitutional and permanently enjoin all Defendants from enforcing it.”
Representing SAF and its partners are attorneys Bradley A. Benbrook at the Benbrook Law Group, PC and David H. Thompson at Cooper & Kirk, PLLC. SAF is joined in this case by the San Diego County Gun Owners Political Action Committee, California Gun Rights Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., John W. Dillon, Dillon Law Group, P.C., George M. Lee, Gunfighter Tactical, LLC, John Phillips, PWGG, L.P., Ryan Peterson and James Miller.
The 21-page response was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, where the case is being heard by District Judge Roger T. Benitez.
“If it weren’t for the serious nature of the law, which seeks to penalize and discourage legal challenges to California gun control laws by essentially forcing plaintiffs and their attorneys to pay all legal costs,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “we would say their arguments are just getting nuttier. But this is a serious matter, designed to squelch legitimate challenges to California’s increasingly restrictive and constitutionally-questionable firearms regulations.”
Cast Iron Ware:
It is always nice to get extra tourniquets or Israeli bandages:
CA APPEALS COURT DENIES STAY OF INJUNCTION IN GUN PRIVACY CASE
BELLEVUE, WA — A California appeals court panel has unanimously denied a request from state Attorney General Rob Bonta for an immediate stay of an injunction in a case brought by the Second Amendment Foundation in a challenge of the state law allowing the state Department of Justice to share personal information about firearms owners with private researchers.
Bonta claimed the law, AB 173, “does not create a serious invasion of privacy.” The trial court disagreed, granting a preliminary injunction to the plaintiffs, thus placing a hold on enforcement of the information sharing law. The case is known as Barba, et.al. v. Bonta.
SAF is joined in the lawsuit by the Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, San Diego County Gun Owners PAC, Orange County Gun Owners PAC, Inland Empire Gun Owners PAC and a private citizen, Ashleymarie Barba. They are represented by attorneys Bradley A. Benbrook and Stephen M. Duvernay with the Benbrook Law Group, PC in Sacramento.
“We’re delighted the appeals court panel unanimously rejected Bonta’s effort to set aside the preliminary injunction because the privacy of California gun owners is important, even if he thinks otherwise,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “Bonta is determined to supply gun owner information to biased researchers who, we believe, will use it to promote additional restrictions on their Second Amendment-protected rights.”
Gottlieb dismissed arguments by Bonta that the researchers take steps to protect identifying information about gun owners.
“That’s not the point,” Gottlieb said. “The point of our challenge is that this information is being shared at all, especially with non-government entities. This isn’t just about Second Amendment rights. California’s law clearly threatens the privacy rights of gun owners.”
The lawsuit was filed because of a change in the California Penal Code that required the state DOJ to share private information on millions of gun owners in the state, with the California Firearm Violence Research Center and others
SAF ATTORNEYS RESPOND TO BONTA, NEWSOM BRIEFS IN CAL. FEE SHIFTING CASE
BELEVUE, WA – Attorneys representing the Second Amendment Foundation and its partners in a challenge of California’s fee-shifting law have filed a consolidated response to court briefs filed by Attorney General Rob Bonta and Gov. Gavin Newsom.
California’s new law includes a one-way fee-shifting penalty to discourage lawsuits against restrictive gun laws, creating a chilling effect on the ability to challenge unconstitutional laws that restrict individual rights and freedoms.
This is the case in which Newsom has intervened with his own attorneys because Bonta recently stepped away from defending the California statute because it is based on a Texas law, known as S.B. 8, which Bonta has already asserted is unconstitutional. The Texas statute deals with abortion. Newsom and state lawmakers created Section 1021.11 in the California statute and admit it was in retaliation against the Texas law.
As noted in the brief, “By intervening here, the Governor has thus offered further proof that Section 1021.11 is an act of political retribution that he intends to follow through on, at the expense of California citizens’ fundamental rights, if S.B. 8 is upheld. Meanwhile, he has failed to offer any colorable argument that Section 1021.11 is constitutional. It is not. The Court should declare Section 1021.11 unconstitutional and permanently enjoin all Defendants from enforcing it.”
Representing SAF and its partners are attorneys Bradley A. Benbrook at the Benbrook Law Group, PC and David H. Thompson at Cooper & Kirk, PLLC. SAF is joined in this case by the San Diego County Gun Owners Political Action Committee, California Gun Rights Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., John W. Dillon, Dillon Law Group, P.C., George M. Lee, Gunfighter Tactical, LLC, John Phillips, PWGG, L.P., Ryan Peterson and James Miller.
The 21-page response was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, where the case is being heard by District Judge Roger T. Benitez.
“If it weren’t for the serious nature of the law, which seeks to penalize and discourage legal challenges to California gun control laws by essentially forcing plaintiffs and their attorneys to pay all legal costs,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “we would say their arguments are just getting nuttier. But this is a serious matter, designed to squelch legitimate challenges to California’s increasingly restrictive and constitutionally-questionable firearms regulations.”
Last edited by lrsrngr on Thu Dec 15, 2022 10:27 pm, edited 6 times in total.
H-U-A or "Hooah!" = Heard Understood & Acknowledged. In context: "Roger that sir, HUA!"
- Hmfigueroa
- OAUSA Board Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:28 pm
- Call Sign: Ke6vrl
- Location: Crossville, TN
- Contact:
Re: OAUSA Net - December 15, 2022 - Christmas gifts for the outdoor enthusiasts
Yaesu FTM300DR is an advanced mobile radio with great features and a moderate price. Recent Prices at 430 range.
A TWOBAT radio two bands at a time with the added functionality of two digital reviewers. Cross band repeater that is digital fusion capable. Remoteable face gives you many mounting options.
Using free software and useful websites like Repeaterbook.com makes programming very simple. SD memory cards make it able to be programmed for different locals very easily.
A TWOBAT radio two bands at a time with the added functionality of two digital reviewers. Cross band repeater that is digital fusion capable. Remoteable face gives you many mounting options.
Using free software and useful websites like Repeaterbook.com makes programming very simple. SD memory cards make it able to be programmed for different locals very easily.
Hector Figueroa
Toyota 4Runner
ICOM IC-5100
Yaesu FT-891
Mercedes Sprinter
Icom IC-7100
Yaesu FTM-400XDR
Crossville, TN
Toyota 4Runner
ICOM IC-5100
Yaesu FT-891
Mercedes Sprinter
Icom IC-7100
Yaesu FTM-400XDR
Crossville, TN
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests