Donate

California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

This forum is for technical questions, advice, and general communications discussions, including alternative communications devices such as CB, GMRS and FRS.
Post Reply
hmfigueroa

California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

Post by hmfigueroa » Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:57 am

Here is a story from the American Radio Relay League

http://www.arrl.org/news/california-ham ... oad-rescue

California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

06/15/2010

On Saturday, June 12 around 1:30 local time, Jim Siemons, AF6PU, of Walnut Creek, California, was checking his e-mail when he received a message from a friend who was concerned that his brother -- who, along with four friends had taken an off-road adventure along California’s famed Rubicon Trail -- had not come home when expected. Siemons’ friend told him that his brother’s group had left on Wednesday with four off-road vehicles in an attempt to cross the Trail. Since Siemons and his friend’s brother were members of the same off-roading club, his friend thought Siemons might have some information.

Siemons forwarded the e-mail to several other club members; within five minutes, he received a phone call from fellow club member Jenny Ward, KI6YBQ, suggesting that he try Amateur Radio to attempt to locate the missing group. The Rubicon Trail connects Georgetown with the west side of Lake Tahoe. Although incredibly beautiful, it traverses some of America’s most challenging off-road trails as it meanders through peaks reaching upwards of 12,000 feet. There is no cell phone coverage on the Trail and very limited official agency radio coverage, making Amateur Radio the only effective means of communication in the area.

Siemons told the ARRL that he grabbed his ARRL Repeater Directory and looked for a repeater frequency and offset that might cover the Rubicon Trail: “I discovered the KA6GWY repeater on 146.805 MHz with a CTCSS tone of 123 Hz in Pollock Pines/Placerville, California, more than 100 miles away from my location. I knew that I was not going to be able to hit that repeater with my handheld transceiver, so I put out a call on Mt Diablo Amateur Radio Club’s W6CX repeater with a frequency of 147.060 MHz with a CTCSS tone of 100 Hz.”

When Siemons heard John Ronan, K3ZJJ, operating on the repeater, he asked for his assistance. “I knew he was at the top of the Oakland hills and would have a fair chance of hitting the Pollock Pines repeater,” Siemons explained. “He agreed to help out and was able to make contact with a couple of hams who were in the vicinity of the Rubicon’s trailhead who offered to help.” Merlin Scott, KC6BFV, was volunteering at the trailhead in the gatekeeper’s hut and had access to an El Dorado County Sheriff’s Office radio. Ronan was able to relay information to a pair of Sheriff Deputies who were on patrol in the area. Siemons said he also requested that a call be relayed via Citizen Band on channel 4, as many off-roaders also monitor and use it to communicate vehicle-to-vehicle.

“I was able to report our efforts back to the families of the lost off-roaders, letting them know that everything that could be done was occurring,” Siemons told the ARRL. “I knew one of the off-roaders was a ham, but I was not certain that he had his rig or knew the local repeater frequencies. All the drivers were experienced, but that only went so far, due to fact that the snow levels are still quite high and the trail is still considered impassible at this time of year.”

By 4 PM local time, Siemons said that hams and off-roaders on both ends of the trail were looking for the group, but due to the normal rough condition of the trail and the heavy snow, search and rescue efforts were slowed. By 7 PM, the Sheriff’s Department determined that it was time to launch a helicopter and search the Trail. “A ham using Citizen Band channel 4 made contact with the group and relayed this via Amateur Radio,” Siemons explained. “The helicopter spotted the missing crew and landed on the Trail at approximately 7:30 PM and determined that everyone was healthy. One of the group’s vehicles was abandoned on the Trail due to a broken drive line, making it impossible to drive through the tall drifts of snow.” Hams and the Sheriff’s Department monitored the group’s progress until their exit from the trail. Siemons said he kept the families updated as to the off-roaders’ progress.

“I want to thank the efforts of the Deputies and the dispatchers of the El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department, the amateurs of the Mt Diablo Amateur Radio Club (MDARC) and their W6CX repeater and the amateur operators of the Rubicon Trail and their KA6GWY repeater. This event ended well, but even if it had gotten a lot rougher, it would have been better than it otherwise would have been because of Amateur Radio!”

User avatar
cruiserlarry
OAUSA Board Member
Posts: 2646
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:23 pm
Call Sign: W6LPB
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

Post by cruiserlarry » Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:33 am

Hey, Ken -

Can you link this article to the home page, with the thread title as a heading ???

Everyone who checks out our site should check out this article - sums up the usefulness and importance of ham radio on the trail, IMO :)
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear really bright, until they start talking

W6LPB / WPOK492

Become a DIRTY PARTS FACEBOOK fan !!!

User avatar
OU812
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:58 pm
Call Sign: KJ6COB

Re: California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

Post by OU812 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:34 pm

I agree. This is a great story. I'll be passing this on. Thank you for sharing.
KJ6COB

User avatar
xtatik
Posts: 293
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:58 pm
Call Sign: K6ARW

Re: California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

Post by xtatik » Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:48 pm

cruiserlarry wrote:Hey, Ken -

Can you link this article to the home page, with the thread title as a heading ???

Everyone who checks out our site should check out this article - sums up the usefulness and importance of ham radio on the trail, IMO :)
Certainly Ham radio played a huge roll, but I don't understand why the Ham on the trail needed to be contacted by Chicken Band. Did he only have CB with him?
I read it twice...am I missing sumpin'?
Randy
K6ARW

sdnative

Re: California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

Post by sdnative » Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:30 pm

hmfigueroa wrote:the Sheriff’s Department determined that it was time to launch a helicopter and search the Trail
Just curious, who pays for this? Taxpayers? Does the initiating party or the rescued get charged? Not trying to downplay the "rescue" at all. Again, just curious.

hmfigueroa

Re: California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

Post by hmfigueroa » Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:58 pm

xtatik wrote: Certainly Ham radio played a huge roll, but I don't understand why the Ham on the trail needed to be contacted by Chicken Band. Did he only have CB with him?
I read it twice...am I missing sumpin'?

My read on it is they did not know where the one Amateur Radio equipped vehicle was listening. A pre-arranged communications plan may have helped, or with the lack of a comms plan the "Wilderness Protocol" may have been beneficial. I think the important thing to remember is communications regardless of the mode.

User avatar
xtatik
Posts: 293
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:58 pm
Call Sign: K6ARW

Re: California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

Post by xtatik » Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:55 am

hmfigueroa wrote:
xtatik wrote: Certainly Ham radio played a huge roll, but I don't understand why the Ham on the trail needed to be contacted by Chicken Band. Did he only have CB with him?
I read it twice...am I missing sumpin'?

My read on it is they did not know where the one Amateur Radio equipped vehicle was listening. A pre-arranged communications plan may have helped, or with the lack of a comms plan the "Wilderness Protocol" may have been beneficial. I think the important thing to remember is communications regardless of the mode.
Hmmm, were they only listening and not attempting to get a signal out? Maybe they didn't feel they needed to be "rescued"?
No question any mode is better than none, but the concept of having "adequate" communications should be present in peoples minds when planning a trip. At least in this case, they had made others aware of there plans and whereabouts. But, contact wasn't made until they were right on top of them.
Randy
K6ARW

User avatar
Chazz Layne
Posts: 703
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:39 pm
Call Sign: KF7FEN
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Contact:

Re: California Hams Help Coordinate Off-Road Rescue

Post by Chazz Layne » Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:39 pm

xtatik wrote:Hmmm, were they only listening and not attempting to get a signal out? Maybe they didn't feel they needed to be "rescued"?
That was kind of the impression that I got. I hope they didn't wind up with a bill for an unwanted search chopper... :lol:
Chazz Laynedotcom

Post Reply

Return to “COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL DISCUSSION”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest