OLLIE wrote:Larry,
One note on this comment. How often do you actually use your CB? Those that are not Hams use their CB as their primary comms so the heat them up a lot more than we do. Since I've become a ham I think I can count the minutes of total CB use time on less than one hand.

This may be why Braden is seeing a higher failure rate. I used my Cobra for less than a year and I remember that thing getting crazy hot in my hand when I used it for extended transmit periods. Maybe this has something to do with it?
This isn't a poke but just throwing out some factors for some thought.

Actually, I think that's a very fair comment, and it deserves a response.
While CB is definitely not my primary means of communication, my Midland is on every minute I'm on the trail, and usually in camp as well, in order to be able to relay information from one group to the other when needed. In fact, on our last 100 mile outing at BorregoFest, I was the tailgunner to your lead, transmitting ham received comments and directions to those with CB's on our run. So, while many hams may not use a CB often, I find I have it on, and in use, virtually every trip I take. In fact, I'd venture to say I use the CB more than some with CB only.
The failures that were mentioned were not the radio's transmit or receive circuits, but the actual speaker in the handset. That is likely due to the unit getting bounced around in the vehicle when not in use, as it is a very small speaker with very small (I think 24 gauge) wires attached, and most folks I've seen do not mount the handset - it's put in the glove box, or center console, until they hit the trails. Either way, I agree it should not fail, but I think it is due more to the abuse the radio takes physically, than to the use the radio gets electronically.
Ham radios tend to be built to a higher standard of components and construction - so this could be one more reason to entice those with a CB only to acquire a ham license, and invest in a ham radio...
