Donate

SD County Sheriff to NOT appeal 9th Circuit Court Decision

General discussion of firearms, ammunition, hunting and related topics
Post Reply
User avatar
taugust
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:50 am
Call Sign: KG6WFV
Location: Cuyamaca, CA

SD County Sheriff to NOT appeal 9th Circuit Court Decision

Post by taugust » Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:34 pm

CCW - 9th Circuit Decision.pdf
(108.51 KiB) Downloaded 216 times
Read the statement by the Sheriff's Dept. that the Sheriff will not seek a review of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision. Good news.
Tim
KG6WFV

"It wasn't me... I didn't do it... Nobody saw me do it... You can't prove anything!" Bart Simpson

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke



2003 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 Extra Cab

Tuff Country 5" Lift, King Coilovers, BFG MT's on Black Steel, Onboard Air, Dual Batteries, High Output Alternator, Engel Fridge, Yaesu 857D All Band Amatuer Radio, Custom Skid and Sliders

User avatar
DaveK
Site Admin
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:33 am
Call Sign: K6DTK
Location: American Southwest

Re: SD County Sheriff to NOT appeal 9th Circuit Court Decision

Post by DaveK » Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:29 am

UPDATE

Somehow, I think we all knew this was coming. The comedy of this is that the State Of California is unhappy with a decision from the 9th Circuit. Stop the presses and call Guinness.
CRPA Member Alert

Breaking News from The Washington Times Regarding 9th Circuit Court Opinion
Miller: California Attorney General Tries to Overturn Gun Carry Ruling in
9th Circuit

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... z2udJZ3Gav


Just when residents of San Diego thought they finally had won back the right to bear arms in the county, state politicians used dirty tactics to block it. Late Thursday, California State Attorney General Kamala Harris filed a petition on behalf of the state to ask the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review and reverse its decision in Peruta v. County of San Diego.

That ruling two weeks ago said the county’s restrictive concealed carry permit laws that required “good cause” were unconstitutional. This comes just one week after San Diego Sheriff Bill Gore said he would not seek en banc review and would start issuing permits based on self-defense once the appeals court decision was finalized.



Ms. Harris wrote in the filing that the state should be allowed to intervene in the case because “this case draws into question the constitutionality of the State’s statutory scheme regulating the public carrying of firearms.” She added that the “existing parties will not adequately represent the State’s interests.”


Chuck Michel is the west coast counsel for the National Rifle Association, which funded the lawsuit. He said Ms. Harris‘ motion to intervene was far out of line because her office wasn’t part of the lawsuit, despite repeated requests from both plaintiffs and Sheriff Gore to get involved. “They are trying to improperly influence the court,” Mr. Michel said in an interview. “They are stretching the rules to file in order to get their arguments in front of the court in the hopes that a liberal judge will get the message and ask for a vote himself.”



Since Sheriff Gore did not ask for review, the only way for a hearing by a larger panel of justices in the 9th Circuit is if one asks to go en banc. Other gun grabbers have joined with the attorney general in this backdoor appeal. The Brady Campaign asked for consent to intervene on Thursday. A police association that was an amicus to the court, but not a party to the lawsuit, also filed an en banc review.

“Obviously, what this tells us is the folks that advocate civilian disarmament are upset about the opinion and want to throw everything they can at it to bottle up the 9th Circuit or get it overturned,” said Mr. Michel, whose firm, Michel and Associates, represented the plaintiffs in the Peruta case up to the appeals court level.


The Circuit Court judges have until March 7 to ask for a vote on rehearing the case.

California politicians are notoriously anti-gun and have had a long run on infringing on the rights of citizens on the west coast, so it should be no surprise that Ms. Harris would use deceitful tactics to try to keep hold of gun control laws that seem to be slipping from her grip. But the justices ought not to play petty political games and let stand the ruling that gives the people of San Diego the ability to defend themselves outside the home.


Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times and author of “Emily Gets Her Gun” (Regnery, 2013).

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... z2udLT66Hu
DaveK
K6DTK


Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.
Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

User avatar
BorregoWrangler
Posts: 1920
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 6:53 pm
Location: San Diego, CA (El Cajon)
Contact:

Re: SD County Sheriff to NOT appeal 9th Circuit Court Decision

Post by BorregoWrangler » Thu Mar 06, 2014 7:45 pm

Let's hope some of our 2nd Amendment rights are restored here in CA. Watching the news today and heard that the San Diego Sheriff's Office is getting about 65 CCW permit application request a day. They're saying that current applicants will have to wait until October for things to get processed.
-John Graham
1989 YJ & 2000 TJ

View all my trip reports here at my blog: GrahamCrackers

User avatar
traveltoad
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:20 am
Call Sign: KI6BCA
Location: SoCal
Contact:

Re: SD County Sheriff to NOT appeal 9th Circuit Court Decision

Post by traveltoad » Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:23 pm

That is still better than my chances in LA County.
2024 Ineos Grenadier
2018 Surly Karate Monkey SingleSpeed MTB
2021 Salsa Stormchaser SingleSpeed GravelBike
2023 Sklar SuperSomething GravelBike

2003 LR Discovery *sold*
2007 KTM 950R - gone, not forgotten
2010 KTM 250XCW *sold*

Matchmaker of Homes and People
http://www.aaronshrier.com

Post Reply

Return to “FIREARMS”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest