Donate

thinking about going a different direction

Off topic and general discussions that don't fit any of the above
gon2srf
Posts: 1259
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:57 am

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by gon2srf » Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:43 pm

big dave wrote:
big dave wrote:There is a woman in Running Springs who wants to see my Pathfinder with potential to trade for her early 80's Wagoneer with sbc 350 and chevy drivetrain.
Turns out its a 70-72 which means NO SMOG! :) Thats great, because i wont be driving it enough to worry about making a huge impact on the environment. Im in negotiations now!
Awesome, now sign up for BorregoFest and let's go wheelin'. :D
Image_Image_Image

User avatar
big dave
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 3:51 pm
Location: Norwalk, CA
Contact:

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by big dave » Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:50 pm

Im trying to sell the Pathfinder, its tough. Ive got my mind made up on getting a Cherokee Sport 2 door. Ill settle for a 4 door, but the 2 door has my eye right now. They are a dime a dozen, and the aftermarket is more affordable and available than my Pathfinder.

All the M1009's i was bidding on were taken for much higher than i bidded. :(

Im planning a simple 4" lift, and 33's. Id also like to paint it in flat tan, just like the military desert vehicles. All bumper mods, roof rack, rock sliders...etc are going to be drab green.
'90 Pathfinder
'99 Expedition

sdnative

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by sdnative » Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:19 pm

I've always been impressed with the XJs.

User avatar
Frogeye
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:13 pm
Call Sign: KI6LHP
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by Frogeye » Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:27 am

How about the Jeep Scrambler? One of my favorites.
Chris

User avatar
cruiserlarry
OAUSA Board Member
Posts: 2646
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:23 pm
Call Sign: W6LPB
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by cruiserlarry » Sat Sep 13, 2008 11:05 am

sdnative wrote:I've always been impressed with the XJs.
The Jeep XJs are a good choice for several reasons. They are inexpensive, easy to find parts for, straightforward to work on, and functional in the field. Lots of aftermarket support is available, so they can go from mild to wild quickly.

And XJ is easier to spell than Pathfinder... 8-) :D
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear really bright, until they start talking

W6LPB / WPOK492

Become a DIRTY PARTS FACEBOOK fan !!!

User avatar
hawkeye
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:17 pm
Call Sign: hawkeye
Location: Redlands CA

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by hawkeye » Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:38 pm

What about a Toyota LC? large aftermarket suport. And very reliable.

User avatar
big dave
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 3:51 pm
Location: Norwalk, CA
Contact:

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by big dave » Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:13 pm

hawkeye wrote:What about a Toyota LC? large aftermarket suport. And very reliable.
Too expensive for me :P

Im looking at a couple of full size Ford Broncos this week. Minus the cost of gas, its a fairly comfortable truck for a fat guy, and has a solid chassis and will take 33's stock, 35's possibly. Ive found a whole bunch of them for under $2000, which leaves me with some money to do things like bushings n crap.
'90 Pathfinder
'99 Expedition

User avatar
cruiserlarry
OAUSA Board Member
Posts: 2646
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:23 pm
Call Sign: W6LPB
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by cruiserlarry » Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:36 pm

big dave wrote:
hawkeye wrote:What about a Toyota LC? large aftermarket suport. And very reliable.
Too expensive for me :P

Im looking at a couple of full size Ford Broncos this week. Minus the cost of gas, its a fairly comfortable truck for a fat guy, and has a solid chassis and will take 33's stock, 35's possibly. Ive found a whole bunch of them for under $2000, which leaves me with some money to do things like bushings n crap.
Late model Broncos 92+ won't fit 33" without rubbing in most cases, and need 6" to fit 35" tires properly. Earlier models ('80-'91) barely squeeze 33" stock. Either way, the twin traction beam front suspension is expensive to lift, and hard to keep in alignment, especially if lifted. And the 5.0L (302 cid) and 5.8L (351 cid) are pigs with fuel around town, and worse off-road. So, consider the after-sale costs when you pick out a used 4WD - sometimes the selling price is just the beginning (aside from the obvious mod-fever issue)...

Good luck to you, Big Dave.... :D
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear really bright, until they start talking

W6LPB / WPOK492

Become a DIRTY PARTS FACEBOOK fan !!!

User avatar
big dave
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 3:51 pm
Location: Norwalk, CA
Contact:

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by big dave » Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:52 pm

cruiserlarry wrote:Good luck to you, Big Dave.... :D
Wow thanks for the info Larry! As you can see, ive been shopping and keeping my current investment off the road.
'90 Pathfinder
'99 Expedition

sdnative

Re: thinking about going a different direction

Post by sdnative » Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:56 pm

I thought you were looking at jeep XJs? I still think it would be a good fit.

Post Reply

Return to “OFF-TOPIC DISCUSSIONS”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest